6. R2D Requirements¶
R2D is the UI for a regional simulation. It uses rWhale to run the workflow. The requirements from R2D come from many components.
6.1. Earthquake Loading Requirements¶
EL.1.1.1 |
Replacement of empirical linear models with multi-scale nonlinear models |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
EL.1.1.2 |
Include both multi-scale and multi-phase (account for liquefaction) |
GC |
M |
_ |
_ |
EL.1.1.3 |
Interface between asset and regional simulations using site response method |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
EL.1.1.4 |
Interface between asset and regional simulations using DRM method |
SP |
M |
_ |
_ |
EL.1.2 |
Method to include both the intra-event residual and inter-event residual in simulating spatial correlated ground motion intensity measures with multiple correlation model options. Select site specific grouind motions from PEER to match target intensity |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.1.3 |
Use GIS-Specified Matrix of Recorded Motions |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.1.1 |
Select using default selection options |
SP |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.1.2 |
Select using all options available at PEER site |
UF |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.1.3 |
Select using user supplied spectrum |
UF |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.2 |
Ability to select utilizing PEER NGA_West web service |
SP |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.3 |
Ability to select from list of user supplied PEER motions |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.4 |
Ability to select from list of SimCenter motions |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.5 |
Ability to use OpenSHA and selection methods to generate motions |
UF |
D |
_ |
_ |
EL.2.6 |
Ability to Utilize Own Application in Workflow |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.7.1 |
1D nonlinear site response with effective stress analysis |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.7.2 |
Nonlinear site response with bidirectional loading |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.7.3 |
Nonlinear site response with full stochastic characterization of soil layers |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.7.4 |
Nonlinear site response, bidirectional different input motions |
SP |
M |
_ |
_ |
EL.2.8.1 |
per Vlachos, Papakonstantinou, Deodatis (2017) |
SP |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.8.2 |
per Dabaghi, Der Kiureghian (2017) |
UF |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.9 |
Ability to select from synthetic ground motions |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
EL.2.10 |
Ability to select surrogate modeling events |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
6.2. Wind Loading Requirements¶
WL.1.1.1 |
Utilize GIS and online to account for wind speed given local terrain, topography and nearby buildings |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.1.1.2 |
MultiScale Wind Models |
SP |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.1.1.3 |
Multi-scale models for wind and water flows, i.e. lower fidelity regional models with more refined models to capture local flow |
SP |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.1.2 |
Modeling and simulation for determination of wind loads due to non-synoptic winds, including tornadoes |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.1.3 |
Interface with NOAA |
SP |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.1.1.1 |
Flat Shaped Roof - TPU dataset |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.1.1.2 |
Gable Shaped Roof - TPU dataset |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.1.1.3 |
Hipped Shaped Roof - TPU dataset |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.1.2 |
Accommodate Range of High Rise building |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.1.3 |
Non Isolated Low Rise Buildings - TPU dataset |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.2 |
Interface with data driven Interface with Vortex Winds DEDM-HRP Web service |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.3 |
Accommodate Data from Wind Tunnel Experiment |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.4 |
Simple CFD model generation and turbulence modeling |
GC |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.5.1 |
Uncoupled OpenFOAM CFD model with nonlinear FEM code for building response |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.5.2 |
Coupled OpenFOAM CFD model with linear FEM code for building response |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.5.3 |
Inflow Conditions for non-synoptic winds |
GC |
M |
_ |
_ |
WL.2.6 |
Quantification of Effects of Wind Borne Debris |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.2.7 |
Ability to utilize synthetic wind loading algorithms per Wittig and Sinha |
SP |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
WL.2.8 |
Hazard modification by terrain, topography, and nearby buildings |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.2.9 |
Probabilistic methods are needed to enable site-specific and storm-type specific characterization of likely debris types, weights, and speeds |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.2.10 |
Joint description for hurricane wind, storm surge, and wave hazards |
GC |
D |
_ |
_ |
WL.2.11 |
Libraries of high resolution hurricane wind/surge/wave simulations |
GC |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.12 |
Multi-scale models for wind and water flows, i.e. lower fidelity regional models with more refined models to capture local flow |
SP |
M |
InProgress |
_ |
WL.2.13 |
Ability to select surrogate modeling events |
SP |
M |
_ |
_ |
6.3. Surge/Tsunami Loading Requirements¶
# |
Description |
Source |
Priority |
Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
HL |
Loading from Storm Surge/Tsunami on Local and Regional Assets |
|||
HL.1 |
Regional Loading due to Storm Surge/Tsunami Hazards |
GC |
M |
InProgress |
HL.1.1 |
Multi-scale models for wind and water flows, i.e. lower fidelity regional models with more refined models to capture local flow |
SP |
D |
|
HL.2 |
Local Scale Storm Surge/Tsunami Hazard Options |
|||
HL.2.1 |
Using computational fluid dynamics to model interface and impact between water loads and buildings |
GC |
M |
|
HL.2.1.1 |
CFD to model fluid flow around a single rigid structure |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.1.2 |
Mesh refinement around structures |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.1.3 |
CFD to model fluid flow around a single deformable structure |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.1.4 |
CFD to model fluid flow considering inflow and accumulation of fluid inside a rigid structure |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.1.5 |
CFD to model fluid flow considering inflow, accumulation, and possible outflow of fluid across a deformable structure |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.2 |
Quantification of flood-borne debris hazards |
GC |
M |
|
HL.2.2.1 |
Ability to quantify the effect of unconstrained and non-colliding floating |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.2.2 |
Ability to quantify the effect of colliding flood-borne debris |
SSP |
M |
|
HL.2.2.3 |
Explore multiple methods like Material Point Method (MPM), Immersed Boundary Method (IBM), DEM-CFD, particle tracking |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.2.4 |
Integrate one of the methods for integrating particles with Hydro workflow |
GC |
M |
|
HL.2.3 |
load combinations need to be developed to account for the simultaneous impacts of various flood forces, such as those generated by breaking waves, moving water and flood-borne debris |
GC |
||
HL.2.5 |
Multi-scale models for wind and water flows, i.e. lower fidelity regional models with more refined models to capture local flow |
SP |
||
HL.2.5.1 |
Interface GeoClaw and OpenFOAM |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.5.2 |
Interface AdCirc and OpenFOAM |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.6 |
Libraries of high resolution hurricane wind/surge/wave simulations |
GC |
M |
|
HL.2.6.1 |
Develop a simulation library of GeoClaw simulations |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.6.2 |
Develop a simulation library of AdCirc simulations |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.6.3 |
Develop a simulation library of OpenFOAM simulations |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.7 |
Ability to simulate with surrogate models as alternative to full 3D CFD |
SP |
M |
|
HL.2.8 |
Develop digital twin with OSU wave Tank Facility |
SP |
M |
6.4. UQ Requirements¶
# |
Description |
Source |
Priority |
Status |
Implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UF.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UF.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UF.3 |
|
SP |
|
_ |
_ |
UF.4 |
|
SP |
|
_ |
_ |
UF.5 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UR.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UR.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UR.3 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UR.4 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UG.1 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UG.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.3 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.4 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.5 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.6 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.7 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
US.8 |
|
SP |
|
_ |
_ |
UN.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UN.2 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UN.3 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UB.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UB.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UB.3 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UB.4 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UB.5 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UB.6 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UB.7 |
|
UF |
|
_ |
_ |
UB.8 |
|
UF |
|
_ |
_ |
UH.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UH.2 |
|
SP |
|
_ |
_ |
UO.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
UO.2 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UM.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
UM.1.1 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UM.1.2 |
|
UF |
|
_ |
_ |
UM.1.3 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
UM.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
UM.2.1 |
|
UF |
|
|
_ |
6.5. RV Requirements¶
# |
Description |
Source |
Priority |
Status |
Implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RV.1 |
Various Random Variable Probability Distributions |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
RV.1.1 |
Normal |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.1.2 |
Lognormal |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.1.3 |
Uniform |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.1.4 |
Beta |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.1.5 |
Weibull |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.1.6 |
Gumbel |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.2 |
User defined Distribution |
SP |
M |
_ |
_ |
RV.3 |
Define Correlation Matrix |
SP |
M |
Implemented |
_ |
RV.4 |
Random Fields |
SP |
M |
_ |
_ |
RV.5 |
Ability to View Graphically the density function when defining the RV |
UF |
D |
Implemented |
_ |
6.6. Common Research Application Requirements¶
# |
Description |
Source |
Priority |
Status |
Implementation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
CR.1.1 |
|
|
SP |
|
|
CR.1.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
|
CR.2 |
|
databases |
|
|
|
CR.2.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
CR.3.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.4 |
|
computing environments |
networks |
visualization tools |
|
CR.4.1 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.4.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.4.3 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.4.4 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
CR.5.1 |
|
GC |
|
|
|
CR.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
CR.6.1 |
|
engineering mechanics |
geotechnical engineering |
|
_ |
CR.6.2 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.6.3 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.6.4 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.7 |
|
SP |
|
|
_ |
CR.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
CR.8.1 |
|
|
GC |
|
|
CR.9 |
|
SP |
|
|
core |
CR.10 |
|
UF |
|
_ |
|