Earthquake Engineering with Uncertainty Quantification Application (EE-UQ)¶
Frank McKenna, Wael Elhaddad, Michael Gardner, Chaofeng Wang, Adam Zsarnóczay
The Earthquake Engineering with Uncertainty Quantification Application (EE-UQ) (EE-UQ app) is an open-source research application that can be used to predict the response of a building subjected to earthquake events. The application is focused on quantifying the uncertainties in the predicted response, given the that the uncertainties in models, earthquake loads, and analysis. The computations are performed in a workflow application that will run on either the users local machine or on a high performance computer made available by DesignSafe.
This document covers the features and capabilities of Version 2.0 of the tool. Users are encouraged to comment on what additional features and capabilities they would like to see in future versions of the application through the Message Board.
Ronald. D. Andrus and Kenneth H Stokoe. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear wave velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(11):1015–1025, 2000.
RW Boulanger and K Ziotopoulou. Pm4sand (version 3): a sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Center for Geotechnical Modeling Report No. UCD/CGM-15/01, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Calif, 2015.
K. Onder Cetin, Kohji Tokimatsu, Leslie F. Harder, Robert E. S. Moss, Robert E. Kayen, Armen Der Kiureghian, and Raymond B. Seed. Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(12):1314–1340, 2004. doi:10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314).
Long Chen and Pedro Arduino. Implementation, verification, and validation of PM4Sand model in OpenSees”. PEER Report - Submitted, under review, 2020.
Mayssa Dabaghi and Armen Der Kiureghian. Stochastic model for simulation of near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(6):963–984, 2017. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eqe.2839, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eqe.2839, doi:10.1002/eqe.2839.
Mayssa Dabaghi and Armen Der Kiureghian. Simulation of orthogonal horizontal components of near-fault ground motion for specified earthquake source and site characteristics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(6):1369–1393, 2018. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eqe.3021, arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eqe.3021, doi:10.1002/eqe.3021.
Mayssa Dabaghi and Armen Der Kiureghian. Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Near-Fault Ground Motions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. Technical Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2014.
Xingquan Guan, Henry Burton, and Thomas Sabol. Python-based computational platform to automate seismic design, nonlinear structural model construction and analysis of steel moment resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 224:111199, 2020.
I. M. Idriss and R. W. Boulanger. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. MNO-12. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Calif., 2008. ISBN 9781932884364.
K. Ishihara. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique, 43(3):351–451, 1993. doi:10.1680/geot.1918.104.22.1681.
Arash Khosravifar, Ahmed Elgamal, Jinchi Lu, and John Li. A 3D model for earthquake-induced liquefaction triggering and post-liquefaction response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 110:43–52, 2018. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726117308722, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.008.
Kok Kwang Phoon and Fred H. Kulhawy. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(4):612–624, 1999. doi:10.1139/t99-038.
HyungSuk Shin. Numerical modeling of a bridge system & its application for performance-based earthquake engineering. PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2007.
Paul G. Somerville, Nancy F. Smith, Robert W. Graves, and Norman A. Abrahamson. Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1):199–222, 01 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199, arXiv:https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article-pdf/68/1/199/2753665/srl068001\_0199.pdf, doi:10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199.
Christos Vlachos, Konstantinos G. Papakonstantinou, and George Deodatis. Predictive model for site specific simulation of ground motions based on earthquake scenarios. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(1):195–218, 2018. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eqe.2948, doi:10.1002/eqe.2948.
Fumio Yamazaki and Masanobu Shinozuka. Digital generation of Non-Gaussian stochastic fields. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114(7):1183–1197, 1988. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1988)114:7(1183).
T. L. Youd and I. M. Idriss. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 nceer and 1998 nceer/nsf workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(4):297–313, 2001. doi:10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).