k-Epsilon model

k-ϵ model was originally proposed by [LaSp1974]. It is one of the most common model used for simulation of turbulent flow conditions. The model introduces two variable transport equation related to:

  • Turbulence kinetic energy (k)

  • Rate of dissipation of turbulence kinetic energy(ϵ)

The k-ϵ model is one of the most popular models and widely used for a range of applications from industrial to environmental flows. This popularity can be attributed to the fact that it remains one of the simplest turbulence models, has good convergence properties and lower memory requirements. It is also often used to provide an initial estimate for more complex turbulent wall models. This model is not recommended for unconfined flows, flow cases involving strong curvatures, rotating flows etc.

k-ϵ model focuses on the mechanisms that affect the turbulent kinetic energy. The underlying assumtion is that the turbulent viscosity is isotropic. This imples that the ratio between the Reynolds’ stress and the mean rate of deformation is same in all directions. The standard k-ϵ model proposed by [LaSp1974] includes additional transport equations given as

  • For turbulent kinetic energy (k)

    (5.1.1)(ρk)tT1+(ρkui)xiT2=xj[μtσkkxj]T3+2μiEijEijT4ρϵT5
  • For dissipation (ϵ)

    (5.1.2)(ρϵ)tT1+(ρϵui)xiT2=xj[μtσϵϵxj]T3+C1ϵϵk2μtEijEijT4C2ϵρϵ2kT5

where ui represent the velocity components, Eij represent the component of rate of deformation, μt=ρCμk2ϵ represents the eddy viscosity. The other constants σk,σϵ,C1ϵ,C2ϵ are adjustable constants.

The physical interpretation of the various terms in the above equation are as follows:

  • T1: Rate of change of k/ϵ in time

  • T2: Transport of k/ϵ by advection

  • T3: Transport of k/ϵ by diffusion

  • T4: Rate of production of k/ϵ

  • T5: Rate of destruction of k/ϵ

A more comprehensive overview on the k-Epsilon model is discussed in the below video

References

LaSp1974(1,2)

B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding, “The numerical computation of turbulent flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 3(2), pp. 269 - 289 (1974)