1.2. Regional Earthquake Hazard Use Cases

The major use cases of Regional Earthquake Hazard in R2D can be divided into Scenario-specific or Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis.

../../../_images/R2DScenarioOrPSHA.png

Fig. 1.2.1 Specific Earthquake Scenario or Probabilistic Hazard Analysis.

Scenario-specific Earthquake

This option is to analyze an earthquake scenario that consists of one or more ruptures based on an earthquake description of a past or hypothetical event. Some use cases for which this option are:

  1. Analysis of a single rupture. For example, running the “Hayward-Rodgers Creek; HN+HS” segment, which is a specific rupture location, length, characteristics, etc.

  2. Broader analysis of a scenario. For example, running “an M7 earthquake on the San Andreas Fault.” This would include realizations with different ruptures, that all describe an M7 on the San Andreas.

  3. Multiple specified ruptures. This would be used in the case in which a user already has a defined set of ruptures they are interested in studying. This option does not fully capture the probabilistic seismic hazard of a region.

  4. A past earthquake. For example, recreating the Loma Prieta earthquake.

Fig. 1.2.2 shows typical scenario-specific use cases in R2D. All the use cases in Fig. 1.2.2 can be achieved with R2D. The first two options are loading predefined ground motion records or intensity measures in the region, and are described in User-specified Ground Motions. The functionality to interface with some physics-based earthquake simulation databases is also under development in R2D. The third to fifty use cases in Fig. 1.2.2 requires the earthquake hazard simulation tool, and the last option can be achieved as described in ShakeMap Earthquake Scenarios).

The functions in the earthquake hazard simulation tool required for scenario-specific use cases are Site Definition, Earthquake Rupture Forecasting, Intensity Measure Definition, Ground Motion Prediction Equations, Spatial Correlations and Ground Motion Record Selection (optional). The “Scenario-specific” option should be selected in the “Scenario Selection” tool tab. More details of the use cases, required inputs, and some benefits/limitations are summarised in Table 1.2.3.

../../../_images/R2DScenarioSpecificUseCases.png

Fig. 1.2.2 Scenario-specific earthquake hazard use cases.

Table 1.2.3 Typical Scenario-specific Earthquake Hazard Use Cases

Use Case

Recommended Uses

Required Inputs

Benefits/Limitations

Predefined GM

User already has ground motion time histories they are interested in.

Describe any specific file type/folder structure required.

Predefined IM

User already has an IM field they are interested in. GM selection can be done.

Describe any specific file type/folder structure required.

OpenSHA/UCERF

Recommended where UCERF ruptures are available (maybe we can show a map). Recommended because it requires no additional inputs other than selections using the R2D interface (source models are openly available).

No external files are required and all selection can be done in R2D.

Users can select out of several choices of GMM and correlation models to use through the R2D interface. Limited in that it only has information available about ruptures in certain locations.

OpenQuake

Recommended to describe distributed and background seismicity. Also recommended for use where rupture information is unavailable through UCERF.

External source model file required. The format of source models can be found here, and a database of global earthquake sources can be found at the GEM’s Global Active Faults Database [Styron2020]

Can be used to describe distributed and background seismicity where information on the faults is unavailable.

Point Source

For educational and/or academic use only. The point source option does not accurately reflect real faults.

No external files are required and all selection can be done in R2D.

Not representative of real faults/scenarios.

ShakeMap

Re-creation of a past earthquake event by obtaining seismic intensity measures sufficiently representative of the event.

Inputs are USGS ShakeMap files for a given earthquake scenario. These files must be located in a folder in which at least must be a grid.xml file. These files contain ShakeMaps that include the intensity measures for a given earthquake event as spectral ordinate values (Those can be given as PGA, PGV, PGD and spectral ordinates at different periods). These files can be obtained from USGS’s ShakeMap archives for real past earthquake events.

ShakeMap intensity measures (as spectral ordinates) for past earthquakes might not be an accurate representation of this event in locations far from the grid control points (usually recording stations where GMM predictions are adjusted to match real recorded ground motion spectra). Moreover, the set of scenarios is limited.

Regional Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

The regional probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) characterizes the probability of certain levels of intensity are exceeded in a region considering all nearby earthquake sources. Fig. 1.2.2 shows two typical use cases in regional PSHA. Both use cases can be achieved in R2D with the earthquake hazard simulation tool. The functions in the earthquake hazard simulation tool required for regional PSHA are Site Definition, Earthquake Rupture Forecasting, Intensity Measure Definition, Ground Motion Prediction Equations, Spatial Correlations, Ground Motion Record Selection (optional), and hazard consistent downsamping (optional). The “Conventional Monte Carlo” or “Hazard consistent downsampling” option should be selected in the “Scenario Selection” tool tab. More details of the use cases, required inputs, and some benefits/limitations are summarised in Table 1.2.4.

../../../_images/R2DRegionalPSHAUseCases.png

Fig. 1.2.3 Regional probabilistic seismic hazard analysis use cases.

Table 1.2.4 Typical Regional Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Use Cases

Use Case

Recommended Uses

Required Inputs

Benefits/Limitations

OpenSHA/UCERF

Recommended where UCERF ruptures are available (maybe we can show a map). Recommended because it requires no additional inputs other than selections using the R2D interface (source models are openly available).

No external files are required, and all selections can be done in R2D.

Only available for California.

OpenQuake

Recommended for use where UCERF ruptures are unavailable.

External files required. The format of source models can be found here, and a database of global earthquake sources can be found at the GEM’s Global Active Faults Database [Styron2020]

Users need to prepare their earthquake source model.

Styron2020(1,2)

Styron, Richard, and Marco Pagani. “The GEM Global Active Faults Database.” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 36, no. 1_suppl, Oct. 2020, pp. 160–180, doi:10.1177/8755293020944182.